Bengaluru: Karnataka Information Commission (KIC) has ruled that all govt agencies should ensure transparency in recruitment by disclosing marks of selected candidates. The directive comes in the backdrop of an appeal being heard on Karnataka Neeravari Nigama (KNN) Ltd’s recent recruitment. State information commissioner Rajashekara S directed Nigama to paste the selection list on its head office notice board and upload it on its official website. Rajashekara also directed Nigama to disclose the marks of selected candidates in all recruitments undertaken by it in future too.The directive followed a complaint from Jnanabharathi resident KP Nanjundaswamy, who had applied for the post of accounts assistant in KNN. After failing in the interview, he filed an RTI application on June 15, 2023, and sought to know the interview marks of candidates to understand how selections were made.“I just wanted to understand in which section I lost marks,” Nanjundaswamy told TOI. With no response from the public information officer (PIO), he filed an appeal on Aug 25, 2023, followed by a second appeal to the commission on Dec 7, 2023, after the first appellate authority also failed to respond. It was only after KIC issued a notice that the PIO responded, denying the information and claiming the data was “personal” and not linked to public interest.Rajashekara rejected this defence, stating that transparency in public recruitment outweighs privacy concerns in such cases. “We are also of the view that disclosure of marks, though it may fall in the category of personal information, is presently necessary in public interest, and therefore, it is not information which cannot be given by the information officer under RTI Act, 2005. To the contrary, such information must be disclosed in order to maintain transparency in the process,” Rajashekara said, quoting a Supreme Court judgment.The SC had stated: “Though marks may fall under personal information, their disclosure is necessary in public interest to ensure transparency in the selection process.”Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, personal information can be withheld only if it causes an unwarranted invasion of privacy and lacks public interest. However, when it comes to recruitment, transparency takes precedence. Backing this view, the commissioner added that Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) has consistently been publishing both written and interview scores of all candidates, setting a precedent for transparency. “The PIO and first appellate authority neither provided the information nor issued any reasoned denial until the commission issued a notice,” the order noted, calling out the inaction as unacceptable under RTI norms.After going through the evidence and hearing both sides, the commission directed KNN PIO and the company secretary to furnish the requested interview marks to the appellant before the next hearing. Following this, KNN not only furnished the list of candidates and marks scored by them but also pasted the same on the notice board at its head office recently.