Man tied to pole, beaten to death over illicit affair | Patna News – Times of India
Patna: A 35-year-old man was tied to a pole and beaten to death at Garbhu Sthan Gopalpur village in Munger on Wednesday allegedly over an illicit affair with a married woman. His family members have accused the woman’s husband and relatives of being involved in the killing, reports Kshitiz
Shampur SHO Nitish Kumar said victim Abhinandan Singh, alias Sempu Kumar, had criminal antecedents, and that he had been to jail several times in murder and extortion cases among others.
We also published the following articles recently
85-year-old woman raped, murdered by 35-year-old drunk man in Bareilly
An 85-year-old woman in Bareilly’s Hafizganj was allegedly raped and killed by a 35-year-old man, Rakesh Kumar, who was under the influence of alcohol. The woman’s relatives discovered the crime and notified neighbors, who caught Kumar. Police have arrested him and are questioning him while awaiting the autopsy report. The village remains tense but under control.
An 85-year-old woman in Bareilly’s Hafizganj was allegedly raped and killed by a 35-year-old man, Rakesh Kumar, who was under the influence of alcohol. The woman’s relatives discovered the crime and notified neighbors, who caught Kumar. Police have arrested him and are questioning him while awaiting the autopsy report. The village remains tense but under control.
Protection for live-in couples a tacit nod to ‘illicit ties’, says High Court
The Punjab and Haryana High Court refused police protection to a couple in a live-in relationship. The court stated that vague claims are insufficient to define their relationship. The judge highlighted marriage’s societal importance, expressing concerns about live-in relationships and their impact on traditional values. The couple unsuccessfully sought protection from family interference.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court refused police protection to a couple in a live-in relationship. The court stated that vague claims are insufficient to define their relationship. The judge highlighted marriage’s societal importance, expressing concerns about live-in relationships and their impact on traditional values. The couple unsuccessfully sought protection from family interference.
